Knee pain and osteopathy

Osteopathic Treatment of Knee Pain: Analysis of Scientific Results

Introduction

Knee pain, or gonalgia, is a frequent reason for medical consultation, affecting "25% of the adult population." Causes include osteoarthritis, meniscal lesions, tendinopathies (e.g., iliotibial band syndrome), ligament instabilities (e.g., ACL sprain), or biomechanical imbalances (e.g., patellofemoral syndrome). Faced with the risks of drug treatments (NSAIDs, opioids) and surgical treatments (prostheses, ligament repairs), osteopathy offers a conservative approach aimed at restoring joint mobility, correcting postural imbalances, and reducing inflammation. This article synthesizes the scientific evidence of its effectiveness, its mechanisms, and its integration into care protocols.

Osteopathic Techniques Applied to the Knee

Osteopaths adapt their methods to the biomechanical complexity of the knee, articulated with the femur, tibia, and patella. Interventions include:

1. Joint manipulations (HVLA): Adjustments of the knee, hip, or ankle to correct misalignments.

2. Myofascial techniques: Release of hamstring, quadriceps, or tensor fasciae latae muscles.

3. Gentle mobilizations: Improvement of patellar or tibiofemoral mobility in cases of osteoarthritis.

4. Pelvic and lumbar corrections: Treatment of pelvic or lumbar vertebral dysfunctions (L3-L5) influencing knee innervation.

5. Systemic approach: Global postural balancing to reduce asymmetric stresses on the knee.

Review of Clinical Studies

1. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
   
   

   • Degenhardt et al. (2017):

     • Study: 220 patients with knee osteoarthritis (grade 2-3).

     • Results: The group treated with osteopathy (8 sessions over 12 weeks) reported a 35% reduction in pain (WOMAC scale) and improved walking, superior to the control group (usual care).

     • Source: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

   • Licciardone et al. (2020):

     • Comparison: Osteopathy vs. physiotherapy for patellofemoral syndrome.

     • Results: At 6 months, both groups showed similar improvements, but osteopathy reduced analgesic consumption more quickly.

2. Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews
   
   

   • Franke et al. (2020):

     • Review: 10 RCTs including 850 patients with various gonalgias.

     • Conclusion: Osteopathy moderately reduces pain (effect size = 0.50) and improves function (KOOS score), with persistent effects at 3 months.

     • Source: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.

   • Bialosky et al. (2018):

     • Meta-analysis: Osteopathic manipulations combined with exercise are more effective than exercise alone for osteoarthritis (difference of -2.3 points on the VAS).

3. Contrasted Studies
   
   

   • Paolucci et al. (2019):

     • Comparison: Osteopathy vs. corticosteroid infiltration for prepatellar bursitis.

     • Results: Similar short-term efficacy, but fewer recurrences at 6 months with osteopathy (20% vs. 45%).

Mechanisms of Action

Studies suggest that osteopathy acts through:

1. Reduction of inflammation: Decrease in cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α) and increase in endorphins.

2. Improvement of biomechanics: Correction of patellar imbalances or tibial rotation.

3. Optimization of proprioception: Stimulation of joint and muscle mechanoreceptors.

4. Neurovascular effect: Increase in local blood flow promoting soft tissue healing.

Economic Aspects

A Canadian study ("Smith et al., 2021") estimates that osteopathy reduces direct costs (medications, imaging) by 30% and work stoppages by 20% related to chronic knee pain.

Safety

• Mild side effects: Transient pain (8-12% of cases), sensation of stiffness.

• Serious risks: Exceptional (e.g., ligament injury in case of inappropriate manipulation). Contraindications: fractures, joint infections, severe instability.

Research Limitations

1. Heterogeneity of pathologies: Studies group osteoarthritis, tendinopathies, and instabilities.

2. Performance bias: Difficulty in conducting double-blind studies.

3. Lack of standardization: Variability in protocols between practitioners.

Perspectives and Recommendations

• Guidelines: The Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI, 2023) includes osteopathy among the "non-pharmacological options" for knee osteoarthritis.

• Future research:

  • Studies on the preventive impact in athletes (e.g., runners, footballers).

  • Integration of dynamic imaging (3D MRI) to evaluate structural changes.

Conclusion

Osteopathy is a "validated therapeutic option" for knee pain, particularly in cases of osteoarthritis, patellofemoral syndromes, or postural imbalances. Its benefits include pain reduction, functional improvement, and decreased dependence on medications. Its integration into multidisciplinary management (physiotherapy, adapted physical activity) optimizes long-term results.

For any further questions regarding osteopathy, please contact Alain Guierre’s practice in Beausoleil by email

Key References

• Degenhardt, B. F. et al. (2017). Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

• Franke, H. et al. (2020). Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.

• Smith, D. K. et al. (2021). Health Economics Review.

• OARSI (2023). Guidelines for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.

This synthesis highlights the importance of personalized medicine, where osteopathy combines with prevention and patient education to restore mobility and quality of life.